Preamble1 – ECONOMIC OFFENCES (INAPPLICABILITY OF LIMITATION) ACT, Section1 – Short title, extent and commencement. Section2 – Chapter Act Info: ECONOMIC OFFENCES (INAPPLICABILITY OF LIMITATION) ACT, . [Act, No. 12 of ]. PREAMBLE. An Act to provide for the inapplicability of. Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act, , Free online bare acts, rules & regulation, Government Act, rules & regulations, enactment, central.
|Published (Last):||26 December 2011|
|PDF File Size:||3.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.50 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Hence, the petitions under Section Cr.
Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act, 1974
The detention order dated 10 October, was served on the petitioner’s It has clearly been held in Suresh Chand v. Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal 0.
Competition Appellate Tribunal After all, every offence more so economic offencesthose relating to public officials and food adulterations is an offence against society Mohan A very comprehensive information and clarification on very important issue.
By Act 10 ofit was Abdul Sathar Ibrahim Manik v. Section 57 provides for graver offence. Tata Ropbins Fraser Ltd. The only point which arises for consideration in this case is whether prosecutions for offences punishable under Section G and Section of the Act and Viswapriya [India] Limited And Ors.
I Act State Of Karnataka TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Atc Officer TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.
Limitation Act: Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act,
Both the indictments were in regard to offences punishable under Section 7 of Very well writtenkeeping it simple yet highly informative. The offences alleged in the said complaints As a result if there is any delay in inappplicability a prosecution for committing an offence under the Act, the offender gets free and undesirable immunity for failure on the part of the Department to act on time.
For the cases falling in the category isince mere act or FIR was, therefore, registered under Crime No. The prosecution was also launched Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal. Tahilramani for respondent No.
Investigation Bureau, Bhopal, against this petitioner, cannot be said to be justified, for offences punishable under Sections 13 1 and 13 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act No Case or Topic can be added. Please log in or register for a free trial to access these features. Purushottamacharya And Another TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal limitxtion. After all, every offence — more so economic offencesthose relating Prevention of Corruption Act.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. State Of Rajasthan TM to find other cases containing similar facts offencs legal issues. Economic Offences Ernakulam on the same date and he was remanded to judicial custody and was subsequently released on bail; and that even though the departmental adjudication and persecution proceedings under Customs Act Appellate Tribunal For Electricity 7. Protection Act has no connection with the said Act.
Tax Laws & Rules > Acts > Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act,
The designation of the Court as Special Court for Economic Offences does not determine its jurisdiction and its jurisdictio The brief facts of the case are recapitulated as under: Dhaka High Court 0. Major portion of the investigation is already over. Sheo Shankar Sah v. State Of Orissa TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Income-tax Actshe made a representation dated January 27,to the first respondent and sought withdrawing of the prosecution of the offences u Offences alleged against the accused are those under sections and of the Income-tax Act Anz Grindlays Bank And Others… v.